Here's a little video to remind us how our government is.

http://www.dumpalink.com/media/11510503 ... ght_Part_1

I found insane evidence on the Twin Towers incident; how we've
been lied to all along, maybe i'll post it all one day.

_________________

I cant see the link, explain whats going on, i find this topic interesting

_________________
COBRA KAI DOJO NEVER DIES
RIP Shiloh

The reporter gives a brief 'run-down' on the subject of the pentagon,
which the government claims a 757 hit the pentagon.
He states the main obvious evidences which shows and proves, that
a 757 could have never done the little damage that the pentagon received.

He demonstrates a few scales; scaling the building (pentagon), and the
plane (757); showing once again the 757 hit being merely an illusion.

He brings proof from some a very knowledgeble, certified and
experienced, person on the subject and this person dis-proves what
our government told us.

Here are some pictures i can easly come up with:

Here's a pucture od a AA757:


Picture after the impact & callapse showing 0
damage from plain wings:


This picture show's no debris from plane and intact grass;
if the plane were to hit the pentagon as low as the whole is,
it would have left long skid marks on the grass:


Another picture showing the places where should have
been damaged by the plane wings:


Pictures of what the experts think hit the pentagon, A3 Sky Warrior:




Now look in here, and see how interesting it is:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/ev ... chout.html

I found endless videos about this stuff... I'll post 'em when i have a chance.

_________________

so like.. do u think the FBI or some shit knows about all these investigations?

_________________
myspace:
http://www.myspace.com/6016227

75war/nin&thf-retired||54blm/30whm-retired again

Its clear the USI is very aware; maybe even involved, in hiding
this information from the public.

_________________

you've got to be fucking kidding me.

The USI has filtered quite a bit of things researchable online.

Seriously though, do you really think a 757 hit the pentagon?

_________________

Specially after what i have shown you.

_________________

why?





































answer that question for me. why would they stage it? what good came from that?

If we knew that Ike, it would certaintly expose quite a lot.

All we can do is come up with a theory. I remember Bush being
very sure there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq;
well not really. They couldn't find anything to reason the money,
lives & time spent in that war. Oil you may ask? Maybe.
We don't know for sure; but it wasnt terrorism.


Watch the first section of this Video, and you may have an idea.
We can't prove something not said, maybe even lied by Mr. Bush.

http://www.dumpalink.com/media/11497609 ... n_Part_One

I'm not saying i'm right, but i sure don't believe a 757 fit there.
If we've been deceived once, we can be deceived a few more times.

_________________

I don't think people should trust their governments but this is seriously laughable. It's the goddamn internet doing it's thing again!

Its laughable because you havent been effected.

Once things lap your personal life & personal well being,
you'll start thinking about things.

This is something to just think about.

_________________

ive seen a weather cam video of the plane hitting the pentagon
just stop this nonsense you sound like a nutjob


what happened to those people on the 757 also?

THEY WERE ALL ROBOTS!

lol I decided to do some looking into it

http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html


gives explanations for everything kioto was crying about


and exerpt:
Jimmy Walter (reopen911.org): A sugar daddy with poison pills
... the ground-level entry area (where the walls were missing and support columns were missing or severely damaged and severed) was about 90 feet wide. Only the second floor area of the hole was small. Both In Plane Site and the Pentagon Strike web movie disingenuously use selective photos in which the 90-foot ground level hole is hidden behind smoke & water being sprayed by a firetruck, and it isn't even mentioned. But note that not all Pentagon no-757 advocates hide the real proportions of the hole in this way, which makes this misprepresentation even more egregious.
... there IS wreckage, not on the lawn (another example of deceptive, selective choice of photographs) but all over the South parking lot and part of the Heliport (easily visible in the photos taken by Steve Riskus), which were in fact closer to the impact point than the area of lawn that is shown (severe telephoto foreshortening illusion makes the lawn area look close to the building). Sure, one might attempt to debate whether the existing debris field is consistent with an airliner impact, but not acknowledging its existence at all (or the existence of the ground-level 90 foot entry hole) as is the case with In Plane Site and Pentagon Strike, only serves to make 911 skeptics look like conniving liars.

I spent the past 2hr's reading every single thing in that redundant site.

Now tomake, its all easy talk but no proof.

I still did not see a clear hole for the 2 engines; i did see
impact damage surrounding the only hole shown, but that's
probably just a force tension ripple as its been said before.

There's 1 pucture that shows what it seems (not proven) to be
an engine. Watch the 2nd video, i think i'll trust an engeneer
from rolls royce over some dude.

Have you ever flown a plane before? I'm doing Hr's on a cessna
and i find it impossible to do what that 757 did, the speed and angle
at which it was 'flown', you'de rip the wings off way before impact.
And if it was flown
at an angle, pretending the wings didn't come apart, one of the
wings would have hit the ground before impact.

You see little colored things in some pictures, take in the fact that
there might have been normal office furniture; maybe couches,
or just about anything. 1 out of at least 200 seats is merely evidance.

Yup i'm a 'nutjob' and yes, i'm crying.

_________________

I do find it retarded that bush never found any weapons of mass distruction. Personally I have lost A LOT of respect for the USA after the events of 9/11.

I realize bush is just flat out stupid and does not really represent the USA very well, but it was the majority that voted him in.

_________________
COBRA KAI DOJO NEVER DIES
RIP Shiloh

yarr dont blame USA for that its fucking BUSH to be blame lol.

_________________
PS3 Friend list name: Pantherxx Wii code 1629-0463-4657-0263 (revised 9/28/07) Steam ID - Pantherxx010 62BLU 75PLD Reactived 7/5/10 I dare you Click this!

Negative.

The whole re-vote was idiotic.

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/2 ... lloeb.html

_________________

Re voting him into office was pretty stupid.
Yarr gotta understand something though. It isn't the popular vote the wins the office. Its the electorial votes from each state that makes the decision

The bible belt. ( southern states) have alot of influence and power.

_________________
Job 10: 20
The mikey's have a plan. Djay isn't all powerful.

this whole post is about as shady as this link
http://www.ericfolkerth.com//B108261074 ... 621011743/

_________________

Actually, the popular vote was for Gore is 2000. Our electoral system allowed Bush to sweep up the presidency by merely winning Florida (his brother's the governor, oh my!). Now, I'm not too sure that Canada uses an electoral college, considering the fact that most of the population lives near the U.S border so the canidates wouldn't even bother going to the low density boonies (unless trees and large stretches of tundra can vote now...).

edit: come to think of it, that's all the reason to convert to electoral, I guess. I don't know, Canada just seems too backwards for a campaign like the U.S. Two languages? Super low population densities in most places? Awoogah!

Yeah, I don't even really like the USA and I live in it because Bush is retadred.

If you guys watch the Daily Show more often than just random clips like that one posted, he makes some good points that Bush is retarded. I don't think the Colbert Report does, but they're both funny and sometimes interesting.

If this is tongue-in-cheek then it's fucking hilarious. If not then it's still fucking hilarious but in more of a mocking way.

I wonder how many people watch the "Colbert Report" and don't understand that its satire.

_________________
Retired 8/21/06
Don't click this link.